<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Text Link Ads Are Not Going To Use TinyURL For Affiliate Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hannesjohnson.com/text-link-ads-not-using-tinyurl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hannesjohnson.com/text-link-ads-not-using-tinyurl/</link>
	<description>I'm online to make money and hand out lollipops and I'm all out of lollipops...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:27:15 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.hannesjohnson.com/text-link-ads-not-using-tinyurl/comment-page-1/#comment-3319</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hannesjohnson.com/text-link-ads-not-using-tinyurl/#comment-3319</guid>
		<description>Will is right - I also received the email concerning the TLA new link format, but didn&#039;t knew anything [until now] about their &quot;new&quot; link format.


anyway - I&#039;m very curious what is it gonna be after all</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will is right &#8211; I also received the email concerning the TLA new link format, but didn&#8217;t knew anything [until now] about their &#8220;new&#8221; link format.</p>
<p>anyway &#8211; I&#8217;m very curious what is it gonna be after all</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angie</title>
		<link>http://www.hannesjohnson.com/text-link-ads-not-using-tinyurl/comment-page-1/#comment-2994</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 04:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hannesjohnson.com/text-link-ads-not-using-tinyurl/#comment-2994</guid>
		<description>I have never felt good about professional ventures relying this kid of third party product. I am so glad you wrote them to say what we were all thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have never felt good about professional ventures relying this kid of third party product. I am so glad you wrote them to say what we were all thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby Revell</title>
		<link>http://www.hannesjohnson.com/text-link-ads-not-using-tinyurl/comment-page-1/#comment-2897</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby Revell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 00:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hannesjohnson.com/text-link-ads-not-using-tinyurl/#comment-2897</guid>
		<description>I have just started with advertising and do have text link ads. I did get an e-mail from them. Since this happened and me being unfamiliar with how TLA really works, I&#039;ll spend sometime this week learning what this means. I do know that these companies have way too much to hide:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just started with advertising and do have text link ads. I did get an e-mail from them. Since this happened and me being unfamiliar with how TLA really works, I&#8217;ll spend sometime this week learning what this means. I do know that these companies have way too much to hide:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EveryDayFiction.com</title>
		<link>http://www.hannesjohnson.com/text-link-ads-not-using-tinyurl/comment-page-1/#comment-2887</link>
		<dc:creator>EveryDayFiction.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 08:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hannesjohnson.com/text-link-ads-not-using-tinyurl/#comment-2887</guid>
		<description>why in the world would they mask there own affiliates  links?... it just doesn&#039;t make sense to me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why in the world would they mask there own affiliates  links?&#8230; it just doesn&#8217;t make sense to me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hannes Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.hannesjohnson.com/text-link-ads-not-using-tinyurl/comment-page-1/#comment-2815</link>
		<dc:creator>Hannes Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 00:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hannesjohnson.com/text-link-ads-not-using-tinyurl/#comment-2815</guid>
		<description>Will - yeah, it&#039;s all a little bit strange - and I don&#039;t think they&#039;ve sent out an e-mail to all their affiliates telling them not to change their links after all... I guess they&#039;re waiting until the new solution is ready.

But it looks like they&#039;ve received a lot of negative feedback on changing to TinyURL in the first place - and they&#039;re listening to their affiliates which I think is a good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will &#8211; yeah, it&#8217;s all a little bit strange &#8211; and I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;ve sent out an e-mail to all their affiliates telling them not to change their links after all&#8230; I guess they&#8217;re waiting until the new solution is ready.</p>
<p>But it looks like they&#8217;ve received a lot of negative feedback on changing to TinyURL in the first place &#8211; and they&#8217;re listening to their affiliates which I think is a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.hannesjohnson.com/text-link-ads-not-using-tinyurl/comment-page-1/#comment-2804</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hannesjohnson.com/text-link-ads-not-using-tinyurl/#comment-2804</guid>
		<description>If they&#039;re planning to do away with the idea of using tinyurl then why aren&#039;t they telling affiliates before they go and change their links?

The whole thing smells like half an ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they&#8217;re planning to do away with the idea of using tinyurl then why aren&#8217;t they telling affiliates before they go and change their links?</p>
<p>The whole thing smells like half an ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Bennett</title>
		<link>http://www.hannesjohnson.com/text-link-ads-not-using-tinyurl/comment-page-1/#comment-2781</link>
		<dc:creator>John Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 17:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hannesjohnson.com/text-link-ads-not-using-tinyurl/#comment-2781</guid>
		<description>I thought that was strange too.  I read on some website that they thought it was in response to google&#039;s not liking paid links and hopefully masking them a little bit.  But who knows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought that was strange too.  I read on some website that they thought it was in response to google&#8217;s not liking paid links and hopefully masking them a little bit.  But who knows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
